Legal Opinion

Vercellino v. Optum Services, Inc.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided November 4, 2020No. 4:19-cv-03048Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA NATHAN VERCELLINO, Plaintiff, 4:19-CV-3048 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OPTUM INSIGHT, INC., UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF AMERITAS HOLDING COMPANY HEALTH PLAN, and AMERITAS HOLDING COMPANY HEALTH PLAN, Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION This case involves a dispute brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”),

29 U.S.C. § 1001

et seq. over whether an ERISA plan is entitled to reimbursement for benefits it paid for Plaintiff’s medical treatment in the event that Plaintiff, Nathan Vercellino,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API