Legal Opinion
Pitts v. White
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided March 8, 1954No. 357PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Richards, P. J.:
The contention is made that the judgment rendered in favor of the defendant on May 8, 1953, is invalid, by reason of the fact that the jury by which said judgment was rendered was not drawn in the manner provided by the statute and that its proceedings were, therefore, null and void.
Rule 59(b), Del. C. Ann., provides that a motion for a new trial shall be served not later than ten days after the entry of the judgment. The plaintiffs not having filed their motion in the required time did not comply with the rule. Rule 60(b) (6), however, provides that the Superior Court, may,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. . DunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- State v. JamesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1921
- State v. RounerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
- State v. MedleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pitts v. WhiteSupreme Court of Delaware · 1954
- Application of Wilmington Suburban Water Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- Application of Wilmington Suburban Water Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1964
- Application of Diamond State Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1959
- Pitts v. WhiteSuperior Court of Delaware · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.