Skelly Oil Co. v. Murphy
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating" the facts). The parties to this lawsuit have agreed that Oscar T. Murphy has no interest in the land in -controversy, and that his interest therein was legally conveyed by the deed executed by his father on March 3, 1888, and by his recognition of the validity of that deed after he became of age. Oscar T. Murphy owned the lands at the date of his marriage, and his wife never relinquished her dower in the lands. She was married to Oscar T. Murphy on January 19, 1888, and continued to live with him until his death. Oscar T. Murphy ¡moved off the land on March 3,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hatcher v. BufordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
- Ferry v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Tatum v. TatumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- State v. BoneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- City of Little Rock v. ParishSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
3Cited by11 opinions
- Matter of Estate of EppersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Employees' Retirement System of Territory v. ChangHawaii Supreme Court · 1958
- Lecroy v. Cook, Commissioner of RevenuesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Bd. of Comm'rs of Red River Bridge Dist. v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.