Legal Opinion
Faber v. Menard, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided June 17, 2003No. C 03-3034-MWBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
BENNETT, Chief Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.INTRODUCTION. CD ca cn
A Factual Background. CD ca cji
B. Procedural Background. £0 Ci oo
II. LEGAL ANALYSIS.968
A. The Timeliness Of Faber’s Resistance.968
B. The Merits Of Menard’s Motion To Compel Arbitration.969
1. Arguments of the parties.969
2. Prerequisites for arbitration.971
3. Faber’s “validity” challenges.972
a. Lack of consideration. 972
i. Lack of mutuality.972
ii. Continued employment.972
b. Unconscionability.972
i. Adhesion contract.972
ii. Procedural and substantive…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Vis v. American Family Life Assur. Co. of ColumbusDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2011