Legal Opinion
United States v. Royal
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 12, 1996No. 95-2176PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Chief Judge.
Appellant Jerome Royal (“Royal”) makes several claims on appeal. Specifically, he challenges the denial of his motions relating to jury selection and jury instructions, the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction, and sentencing considerations. For the reasons discussed below, we reverse the denial of Royal’s motion to inspect the master jury wheel and remand to allow Royal to inspect the master jury wheel and other relevant records.
BACKGROUND
Factual History
We briefly sketch out the bare facts of this conspiracy, providing facts related specifically to…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. VakninCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. RoyalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Vincent A. Cianci, Jr., Frank E. Corrente, and Richard E. AutielloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. TicchiarelliCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- United States v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.