Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Massey-Ferguson Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 18, 1968No. Gen. 67-121PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoldenhersh, J.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Massac County entered in favor of defendant, Massey-Ferguson Company, a corporation, hereafter called Massey-Ferguson, upon allowance of its motion for summary judgment.

In his complaint, plaintiff alleges that defendant, Frank Venus, hereafter called Venus, doing business as Venus Implement Company, was the agent of Massey-Ferguson, that Venus, and as agent for Massey-Ferguson, entered into a contract with plaintiff to sell him a certain tractor to be delivered “at the request of plaintiff,” that plaintiff was given a trade-in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. DeWittIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Tansey v. RobinsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  3. Miller Ex Rel. Miller v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  4. Halloran v. Belt Ry. Co. of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  5. Gribben v. Interstate Motor Freight System Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Greenstein v. NogleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  2. Daniel Grocer Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  3. Daniel Grocer Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  4. Placko v. FawverAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API