Legal Opinion

Tansey v. Robinson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 24, 1960No. Gen. 47,781PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schwartz

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendant, The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, hereinafter called A & P. Defendant Robinson did not appear. Another defendant, Harloff Brothers, named in the complaint is not involved in this appeal.

The case grows out of an automobile accident which occurred October 3, 1956, in Evanston, Illinois. Plaintiff was seated in her parked car when it was struck in the rear by a truck driven by Robinson who was delivering groceries purchased by A & P customers.

The amended complaint, in summary, charges that Robinson was guilty of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Merlo v. Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Krupp v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People Ex Rel. Noren v. DempseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Gliwa v. Washington Polish Loan & Building Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
  5. Ozan Lumber Company v. McNeelySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Gomien v. Wear-Ever Aluminum, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Manahan v. Daily News-TribuneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  3. Sanders v. FrostAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  4. Stocker Hinge Mfg. Co. v. Darnel Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  5. Suhadolnik v. City of SpringfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API