Legal Opinion

Singleton v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 22, 1915PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Criminal Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll.

Affirming.

Under an indictment charging Mm -with, unlawfully taking and operating a motor vehicle, without the knowledge or consent of Burwell K. Marshall, the owner of the machine, the appellant was found guilty and his punishment fixed at an indeterminate period in the penitentiary of not less than two nor more than three years.

*245The indictment was found under Sub-section 35 of Section 2739 of the Kentucky Statutes, reading as follows :

“Any person who shall unlawfully take, drive or operate a motor vehicle without the knowledge and consent of the owner,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Sams v. Sams' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  3. Safety Building & Loan Co. v. EcklarCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  4. Commonwealth v. GrinsteadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  5. Paxton & Hershey Irrigating Canal & Land Co. v. Farmers & Merchants Irrigation & Land Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Kentucky Jockey ClubCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. State v. AustinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Lakes v. GoodloeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. Commonwealth v. GoldburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Town of Green River v. BungerWyoming Supreme Court · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API