Steiner v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
This case focuses upon the provision of a standard contract used by Amalgamated Sugar Company to purchase sugar beets from the plaintiffs (hereinafter, the growers). Amalgamated has appealed a district court judgment holding that this provision *113does not allow Amalgamated to deduct, from the price it paid the growers, legal fees incurred by Amalgamated in defending and settling complaints for alleged violations of antitrust law. We affirm.
The growers cross-appeal, arguing that the district court should have awarded attorney fees to them pursuant to I.C. § 12-120(2). The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rasmussen v. MartinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- Foremost Insurance v. PutzierIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Bennett v. BlissIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- Torix v. AllredIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
- McKee Bros., Ltd. v. Mesa Equipment, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- DeWils Interiors, Inc. v. DinesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- Boise Truck & Equipment, Inc. v. Hafer Logging, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- Steiner v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1984