Legal Opinion
Menefee v. Williams
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 15, 1968No. Civ. 8620PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCABE, P. J.
We have determined the trial court ruled correctly in not allowing a statement regarding liability insurance to be admitted into evidence and in instructing the jury on the issue of contributory negligence.
The plaintiff, Marvin Menefee, met the defendant, David Williams, while “sighting in” his rifle at the Orange Coast Gun Club preparatory to deer season sometime in late 1964. The two became acquainted and agreed to meet in Colorado for the deer hunting season with two friends of the defendant, Roy Chism and Clyde Bickery. Plaintiff met these three companions in Dolores, Colorado, after…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Sills v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Citti v. BavaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Roche v. Llewellyn Iron Works Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Staples v. HoefkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- People v. CartwrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Brainard v. CotnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Hilburn v. BrodheadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Farmy v. College Housing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.