Legal Opinion

Langley v. Schumacker

California Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1956No. L. A. 23808Published

1Opinion of the Court

46 Cal.2d 601 (1956)

297 P.2d 977

ENA DOROTHY LANGLEY, Appellant,

v.

SPENCER SCHUMACKER, Respondent.

Docket No. L.A. 23808.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

June 4, 1956.

Maurice Rose for Appellant.

Crawford & Baker, Ames Crawford and James H. Lyons for Respondent.

SHENK, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered following an order sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff's second amended complaint.

Ena Langley, the plaintiff, brought this action to recover damages from the defendant, Spencer Schumacker, upon a cause of action for fraud. In her second amended complaint the plaintiff alleged that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Peters v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Thibault v. LalumiereMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Lanigan v. NeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. Andie v. KaplanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API