Legal Opinion
Johnston v. Debock
California Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 1926No. Docket No. Sac. 3644PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is an action in ejectment and for the value of the use and possession of certain real property in the city of Sacramento. The plaintiff had judgment and the defendants appeal under the alternative method.
The appellants are husband and wife. The respondent was at one time the wife of Louis DeBock, a brother of the appellant August DeBock. In an action for damages for alienation of affections commenced and first tried in Placer County and tried the second time in the county of Sacramento, the respondent, on November 18, 1916, recovered a judgment against the appellants for five thousand…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Nathan v. DierssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Bullis v. StanifordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Tromans v. MahlmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- De Bock v. De BockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- K. Lundeen Corp. v. BarlowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Ellsworth v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Reidy v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Ferguson v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Nadler v. California Veterans BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.