Dalpe v. Paige (In Re Paige)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND DECISION ON OBJECTION TO PROOF OF CLAIM AND COUNTERCLAIM
ALAN H.W. SHIFF, Bankruptcy Judge.
The plaintiffs, Jack Dalpe and Robert Ciccarelli, have filed a proof of claim as secured creditors to which the chapter 13 debtor-defendants, David and Karen Paige, have filed an objection and a counterclaim. The counterclaim arises out of the same sale transaction as the plaintiffs’ claim. Accordingly, it is determined that this proceeding is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(C), (b)(3).
BACKGROUND
The following facts are adduced from the testimony and exhibits offered at trial.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Conaway v. PrestiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Miller v. ApplebySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Pacelli Bros. Transportation, Inc. v. PacelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Beckman v. JALICH HOMES, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Walters (In Re Walters)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
- Matter of Interco Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997
- Matter of Interco Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 1993
- In Re Lani Bird, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 1991
- In re Interco Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1993