Legal Opinion

Dalpe v. Paige (In Re Paige)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut

Decided October 19, 1989No. 19-20360PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND DECISION ON OBJECTION TO PROOF OF CLAIM AND COUNTERCLAIM

ALAN H.W. SHIFF, Bankruptcy Judge.

The plaintiffs, Jack Dalpe and Robert Ciccarelli, have filed a proof of claim as secured creditors to which the chapter 13 debtor-defendants, David and Karen Paige, have filed an objection and a counterclaim. The counterclaim arises out of the same sale transaction as the plaintiffs’ claim. Accordingly, it is determined that this proceeding is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(C), (b)(3).

BACKGROUND

The following facts are adduced from the testimony and exhibits offered at trial.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Conaway v. PrestiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Miller v. ApplebySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. Pacelli Bros. Transportation, Inc. v. PacelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Beckman v. JALICH HOMES, INC.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Walters (In Re Walters)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
  2. Matter of Interco Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997
  3. Matter of Interco Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 1993
  4. In Re Lani Bird, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 1991
  5. In re Interco Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API