Christianson v. Henke
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STAUBER, Judge.
On appeal from an order granting respondent-grandmother visitation with her grandchild, appellant-mother argues that the district court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction under Minn.Stat. § 257C.08, subd. 2, to grant grandparent visitation because the recognition of. parentage signed by the child’s parents does not constitute a proceeding for parentage for purposes of asserting grandparent visitation under section 257C.08, subdivision 2. We affirm.
FACTS
On August 2, 2007, T.L.H. was born to appellant Claire Holewa. On that date, appellant and respondent Travis Henke…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Hentschel v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Esser v. BropheySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. StahoskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013