Legal Opinion

Canter v. AT&T Midwest Disability Benefits Program

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 19, 2021No. 1:18-cv-07375Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CRAIG CANTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. 18 C 7375 ) v. ) Judge Jorge L. Alonso ) AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT ) PLAN NO. 3, and ) AT&T SERVICES, INC., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER After his short-term disability benefits were discontinued, plaintiff Craig Canter (“Canter”) filed a two-count complaint against defendants AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3 (the “Plan”)1 and AT&T Services, Inc., which is the Plan Administrator. The parties have filed cross motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Clyde Ammons v. Aramark Uniform Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Keith Curtis v. Costco Wholesale CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  5. Doris Keeton v. Morningstar, IncorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API