Legal Opinion

Lindsay v. Texas Iron & Steel Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 9, 1928No. 3521. [fn*]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

(after stating the facts as above). The suit was commenced and prosecuted on the theory, it seems, that the conveyance from the Elliots to the Texas Iron Ore Company was not of the absolute title (as it purported to be) to the iron ore, but of the title conditioned on said company’s beginning the work of mining and removing the ore from the land within a reasonable time and thereafter continuing such mining and removal with proper diligence. As showing that to be the meaning of the instrument evidencing the conveyance appellant pointed to the recitals therein that the consideration was $1…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stephens County v. Mid-Kansas Oil & Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Texas Company v. W.H. DaughertyTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Humphreys-Mexia Co. v. GammonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Grubb v. McAfeeTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Munsey v. Marnet Oil Gas CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Anderson v. McRaeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Loomis v. Gulf Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Nelms v. ChazanowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Earl Anderson, Carrie Bell Scott, Sharon Anderson, Evance Anderson, Bill Burton, Willie Mae Anderson, and Jerry J. Anderson (Smith) v. Robert Louis Durham, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API