Legal Opinion

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Sheets

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 22, 1936No. 25669PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

Suit was brought by the Firestone Tire & Rubber Company in the district court of Canadian county against E. R. Sheets and Mrs. E. R. Sheets, doing business as Sheets Service Station, for an alleged balance due on account for merchandise. The defendants denied partnership under oath, and also denied the correctness of the account sued upon, qnd by way of cross-petition prayed for damages, alleging that the Sheets Service Station’s business had been destroyed by reason of the failure of the plaintiff to perform its promises to make adjustments on tires in accordance with certain dealers’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anvil Mining Co. v. HumbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Bishop-Babcock-Becker Co. v. Estes Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Paola Gas Co. v. Paola Glass Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  5. McGinnis v. StudebakerOregon Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. TK-7 Corp. v. Estate of BarboutiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  2. Florafax International Inc. v. GTE Market Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Ferrell Construction Co. v. Russell Creek Coal Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Vancil v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Larrance Tank Corporation v. BurroughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API