Treis v. Berlin Dye Works & Laundry Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Appeal from judgment upon the judgment-roll.
On September 28, 1906, defendant in writing ordered plaintiff’s assignor, the Commercial Envelope and Box Company, to ship it (the defendant) ten thousand boxes. The order set forth in the complaint contained full specifications as to material, sizes and quality of the boxes, and prescribed certain lettering to be printed thereon. It was also provided that five thousand of the boxes so ordered should be shipped as soon as the box company could get them ready for shipment, and the remainder of said order to be shipped in January, 1907. It is alleged…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ward v. ClayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Penrose v. WinterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Larew v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Maxwell v. Bay City Bridge Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Scharman v. ScharmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Steel Pipe & Tank Co. v. HubbardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919