Legal Opinion

State v. Moses

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 27, 1999No. A99A0273PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Harold R. Banke.

After Mark Moses performed poorly on field sobriety tests, Officer Campbell placed him under arrest for DUI and read him the Implied Consent Notice set forth in OCGA § 40-5-67.1 (b). Officer Campbell requested that he submit to a breath test, to which Moses consented. Dissatisfied with the results of that test, Officer Campbell re-read Moses the “Implied Consent Notice,” this time asking for a blood test. Again Moses consented, and the test was taken. At no point was Moses warned of his rights pursuant to Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (86 SC 1602, 16 LE2d 694) (1966).

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. State v. MacKCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. State v. WarmackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. McKeown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hale v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  2. Norred v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API