Legal Opinion

State v. MacK

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 5, 1993No. A92A2212PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge.

Michael Leo Mack was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol and speeding. He filed a motion to suppress evidence, which the trial court granted in part and denied in part. The court denied the motion as to statements made by Mack prior to his arrest and as to the results of a breath test taken by Mack. The court granted the motion as to an implied consent warning form signed by Mack. The form stated that Mack agreed to take a breath test requested by the arresting officer pursuant to OCGA §§ 40-5-55 and 40-6-392. The court ruled that the form was inadmissible…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wessels v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  3. State v. HighsmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FeltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Scanlon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  3. State v. CoeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Kehinde v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  5. State v. AustellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API