Legal Opinion

Cities & Villages of Wisconsin v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided January 8, 1991No. Nos. 89-1692, 90-1042PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge D.H. GINSBURG.

D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:

Coal supply contracts routinely contain a “take-or-pay” provision, under which the purchaser agrees that if it does not take delivery of a minimum amount of coal during each month or year of the contract term, it will pay the coal supplier part of the price of the coal not taken. In 1986 and 1987, Northern States Power Company (Minnesota) paid approximately $10 million to Westmoreland Resources, Inc., pursuant to invoices for minimum take payments. Because Northern (Minnesota) participates in a system-wide…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Transcanada Pipelines Limited v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, No. 87-1229Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  2. Southern California Edison Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Cities of Anaheim, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  3. Minnesota Power & Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cities And Villages Of Bangor, Barron, Cadott, Cornell, Medford, Rice Lake, Spooner, Trempealeau, Westby, And Whitehall, Wisconsin v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API