Naden v. Christopher
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Whatcom county, Kellogg, J., entered March 9, 1910, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose a mortgage.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
On and prior to the 15th day of January, 1909, the plaintiff, a resident of the town of Kent, in King county, was the owner of an improved tract of property in the city of Bellingham, in Whatcom county. The defendants were residents of Bellingham. One Wyatt, a real estate man in Bellingham, at the instance of the defendants, induced the real estate firm of Brisbin, Smith & Livesey, also of Belling-ham, to wire the plaintiff an offer for the property of $12,500, $3,500 cash and the remainder on terms. On the following day the plaintiff answered by wire an acceptance, as follows: “Taken at…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Murray v. DakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Isenhoot v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Young v. StampflerWashington Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by2 opinions
- Naden v. ChristopherWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Bertelson v. ArthurWashington Supreme Court · 1926