Legal Opinion

Naden v. Christopher

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1912No. 9878PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for Whatcom county, Hardin, J., entered June 19, 1911, after decree foreclosing a mortgage, directing a sale for installments due since final judgment, upon application of the plaintiif.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

This action was originally brought to foreclose a mortgage for $9,000. The mortgage was made to secure sis notes, for $1,500 each, payable annually with interest at the rate of seven per . cent per annum. After default in the first two semiannual interest installments, action was begun to foreclose the mortgage, and upon issue joined a decree of foreclosure was ordered entered. Between the trial in January, 1910, and March, 1910, when the decree was entered, a principal note, in the amount of $1,500, became due, a decree for the amount then due was entered, and appeal was taken to this court.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago & Vincennes Railroad v. FosdickSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. San Jose Ranch Co. v. San Jose Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Skelton v. WardIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Higgins v. San Diego Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Bank of Napa v. GodfreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Reardon v. AllenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  2. Carbone v. WarburtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Desmond v. KramerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  4. State Bd. of Medical Examiners v. WeinerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  5. Fox v. BD. OF ED. OF W. MILFORD TP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API