Houston Production Co. v. United States
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, in 1924, made a payment to one of its officers on account of'services which, though rendered in past years, did not become an obligation of the company until voted by the directors in this year. In its income tax return it took credit for this amount as an ordinary and necessary expense, and in arriving at its net income from its producing properties for the purpose of discovery depletion, it allowed. 76 per cent, of this amount as an expense of those properties, and as such deducted it from its gross income. The commissioner rejected the item altogether as…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Tyler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Lucas v. Ox Fibre Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Stanton v. Baltic Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- The United States of America v. The Russell Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Guarantee Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
- Grand Central Public Market, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1938
- United States v. BellDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
- United States v. Bibb Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.