Legal Opinion

United States v. Bibb Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 31, 1934No. 7320PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The suit, for income taxes admittedly overpaid, was defended against on the ground that the refund claim was overdue because filed more than three years after August 16, 1926, when appellee paid the last installment on account of income tax for the fiscal year ending August 31, 1925.

The District Judge thought the claim was timely filed, and appellee, plaintiff below, had judgment. The single question whether the defense was good arises upon the construction of clause 1, subd. (b), § 284, Revenue Act of *3681926, 26 USCA § 1065(b) (l),1 2*as applied to the stipulated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hertz v. WoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Houston Production Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1933
  4. Illinois Terminal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  5. Huntley v. Standard Timber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Chicago v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  2. Bryan v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API