Legal Opinion

Sabanovic v. Sabanovic

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 27, 2008No. AC 28105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, J.

The plaintiff in the first case and the defendant in the second case (plaintiff), Ismet Sabanovic, appeals from the trial court’s judgments revoking sealing orders as to testimony, transcripts and exhibits in this family matter. Because the record before us does not contain any of the pertinent testimony, transcripts or exhibits, we are unable to consider whether the court abused its discretion. Accordingly, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.

The plaintiffs appeal arises from his attempt to limit disclosure of two files in which the defendant in the first case and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Desrosiers v. HenneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Vargas v. DoeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. Bove v. BoveConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Doe v. RackliffeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  2. Manzi v. ManziConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
  3. Benvenuto v. BrookmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API