Legal Opinion

Waters v. Pittman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1961No. 25PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The plaintiff alleges in her complaint that the three conveyances introduced for the purpose of attack are neither valid in law, nor in fact; that each of said instruments was made without valuable consideration and was a voluntary conveyance made for the purpose of depriving the plaintiff of her title, interest and estate in said land, and that said instruments constitute a cloud upon plaintiff’s one-half interest in said land.

The warranty deed dated 26 October 1951, executed by Lillian Pittman Hyatt and husband, William Hyatt, of McDowell County, North Carolina, to Clarence Pittman and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Hayes v. RicardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. King v. . McRackanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Whitehurst v. AbbottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Hayes v. RicardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hill v. Pinelawn Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Lawing v. JaynesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API