Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Foreman v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1992No. 90-1920PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We confine our review to determine whether the Busby, Ljuboja and Gross reports, on which the commission expressly relied, constituted “some evidence” to support its decision. We agree with the appellate court’s analysis in all but one respect, and, accordingly, reverse and affirm its decision in part.

Drs. Ljuboja and Busby examined claimant pursuant to his earlier application for permanent partial disability compensation under former R.C. 4123.-57(B). The doctors respectively found a forty percent and five percent permanent partial impairment. However, as we recently held in State, ex rel.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Case v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State ex rel. Kaska v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Foreman v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Carey v. American Seaway Foods, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Carey v. Am. Seaway Foods, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API