Legal Opinion
Goodsell v. Shea
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 18, 1981No. Appeal No. 81-549; Interference No. 99,811PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
Earl M. Goodsell, Jr. (Goodsell) appeals from a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Interferences (board) in Interference No. 99,811. Edward T. Shea (Shea), appel-lee, moves to dismiss the appeal due to an agreement in which Goodsell and Shea purportedly waived all rights to an appeal from the decision of the board. We grant the motion.
Background
During the interference proceedings before the board, Goodsell and Shea entered into an agreement entitled “Stipulation Extending Times Set Forth in Paper No. 53 Dated Sept. 25,1979”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gramling v. Food MacHinery and Chemical Corp.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1957
- United States Consol. Seeded Raisin Co. v. Chaddock & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
- Bollmann v. BollmannSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1875
- Swingline, Inc. v. I. B. Kleinert Rubber CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Donald D. Williams and Hughes Aircraft Company v. The Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
3Cited by6 opinions
- Utter v. HiragaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- In Re Leonard F. LYBARGER, Attorney; Miriam B. HOUCK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LEE WILSON ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Henry H. Brown v. The Gillette CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Baker Industries, Inc. v. Cerberus, Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1983
- Hameli v. NazarioDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.