Grant v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
This is an appeal from convictions by a jury for unauthorized use of a vehicle (“UUV”), D.C.Code 1978 Supp., § 22-2204(a), and violation of the Bail Reform Act (“BRA”), D.C.Code 1973, § 23-1327(a). 1 Appellant Grant contends that (1) the trial court committed reversible error in consolidating the BRA charge with the others for trial, and (2) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for unauthorized use. We disagree and thus affirm.
I
On January 9, 1977, at 2:30 a. m., the police arrested appellant while he was seated behind the wheel of a 1966 gray…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- John Richard Bayless v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Franey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- United States v. Charles P. BourassaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Sam AccardiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- West v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Moore v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- Russell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Ford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.