Richland County v. Village of Richland Center
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Miohland County. The parties agreed upon a case and submitted it to the circuit court pursuant to sec. 2788, R. S., for the purpose of determining the ownership of $560 derived from licenses for the sale of intoxicating liquors granted by the defendant village in 1882. The facts sufficiently appear from the opinion.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Miohland County. The parties agreed upon a case and submitted it to the circuit court pursuant to sec. 2788, R. S., for the purpose of determining the ownership of $560 derived from licenses for the sale of intoxicating liquors granted by the defendant village in 1882. The facts sufficiently appear from the opinion. Erom a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant appealed. [The arguments urged and authorities cited in the able brief of the counsel for the appellant are so fully contained in the opinion of the court that it is not deemed essential to…
1Opinion of the CourtOetoN, J.
Sec. 32, ch. 34, R. S. 1858, provided that the majority of the board of supervisors of any county may determine to abolish all distinction between county poor and town poor in such county, and have the expense of maintaining all the poor therein as a county charge, and the board shall have authority to levy and collect on the taxable property in such county such expense in the same manner as other county charges. Sec. 16, ch. 35 of the same revision, provided that in counties where the county system of supporting the poor has been adopted, all moneys derived from licenses for the sale of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- People Ex Rel. Ryan v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Meriwether v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Mount Pleasant v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Ex Relator McNamara v. ClarkCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Town of Holland v. Village of Cedar GroveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Douglas County v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Town of Bell v. Bayfield CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Spring Water Co. v. Town of MonroeWashington Supreme Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.