Legal Opinion

Ross Engineering Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 6, 1954No. 48832PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge

This case is before ns on the issue whether, under the facts as proved, the plaintiff has legal standing to recover under the War Contract Hardship Claims Act, commonly known as the Lucas Act.

The Lucas Act, Act of August 7, 1946, C. 864 § 1-6, as amended June 25, 1948, C. 646 § 37, 62 Stat. 992, 41 U. S. C. 106 note, provides that a contractor or subcontractor who furnished work, supplies or services during the war period to a department or agency of the Government which had power to give relief to contractors under the First War Powers Act, and who asked for such relief, and who suffered a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fogarty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Howard Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1949
  3. Spicer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  4. Ross Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Chas. M. Dunning Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  2. Ross Engineering Co.United States Court of Claims · 1955
  3. United States v. Dunning Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API