Ross Engineering Co. v. United States

Plaintiff claims its costs for installing certain collateral «equipment and damages for delays due to bad weather.

*5321. Plaintiff’s claim for extra compensation for installing-collateral equipment is without merit. It has been paid the cost of purchasing it, but it claims in addition the cost of installation. This it is not entitled to.

All other considerations aside, plaintiff was told before it executed the contract that the amount specified in the contract covered only the purchase price of the equipment.. Plaintiff executed the contract with this understanding. The specifications are clearly…