Gwillim v. Asher
Supreme Court of Colorado
Action to set aside alleged fraudulent conveyances. Judgment for plaintiff. On Application for Supersedeas. Error to the District Court of El Paso County, Hon: Arthur Comforth, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
*145The defendant in error a judgment creditor of R. J. Gwillim, brought suit against him, Janet, his wife, and Gwladys and Gwendolyn, his daughters, to set aside two certain conveyances of land from said R. J. Gwillim to his said relatives. The plaintiff had a decree and the wife and daughters bring error, and move for supersedeas.
They attack the complaint on two grounds: 1. That two causes are stated in one count; 2. That the facts stated are insufficient. They also claim that the evidence is insufficient to support the decree.
1. The complaint alleges that on December 1, 1919, plaintiff began…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stock-Growers' Bank v. NewtonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
- Rice v. BushSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Gwynn v. ButlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
- Mulock v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
- Gregory v. FilbeckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McGuigan v. HeuerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Roberts v. DietzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
- Sander v. DoodyMontana Supreme Court · 1940
- Scott v. Burlington State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Lackey v. KilleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1927