Legal Opinion

Sander v. Doody

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1940No. 7,991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of dismissal entered for his failure to file an amended eomplaint after defendants’ motion to separately state and number the causes of action was sustained. The legal question presented is whether the complaint states more than one cause of action.

Summarized, the complaint, which was filed in February, 1938, sets forth that plaintiff on January 29, 1937, obtained a judgment in the district court of Musselshell county against defendants Pat Doody, P. R. Staunton and Jack Jarrett in the sum of $1,150, with costs and interest, which is wholly…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pollard v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Towns v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Cohen v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1911

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Enochs v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API