Legal Opinion
Luther v. Iom Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided October 15, 2013No. 2013-C-0353PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.
BWe granted certiorari in this case to review an appellate court reversal of a district court ruling that the defendants, a medical diagnostic monitoring company and its employee/physician, were not “qualified health care providers” (“QHCPs”) under the Louisiana Medical Malpractice Act, LSA-R.S. 40:1299.41 et seq. (“MMA”), for purposes of alleged acts of medical malpractice. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the appellate court, reinstate the district court judgment, and remand.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On October 30th and November 1st of 2007, George Luther underwent two successive…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Samaha v. RauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Hines v. GarrettSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Suire v. Lafayette City-Parish GovernmentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Richard v. HallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Schultz v. GuothSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Roy Bufkin, Jr. v. Felipe's Louisiana, LLCSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
- Semco, LLC v. Grand Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Patriot Construction & Equipment, LLC v. Rage Logistics, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Pertuit v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 2Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Tramuta v. Lakeside Plaza, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.