Legal Opinion
Twin State CCS Corp. v. Roberts
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 12, 1987PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Weiss, J.
Petitioner, a firm engaged in the design, programming and installation of telecommunications systems, was awarded a contract to install new telecommunications equipment in the Clinton County Government Center. Although the request for bid documents issued by the county did not contain a copy of the prevailing rate schedule (hereinafter the PRS) for wages within the locality, petitioner was given, and acknowledged the receipt of, a copy of the PRS on July 6, 1984 (after it received notice of the award) and of an addendum to the PRS on July 13, 1984. After…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Erie County Industrial Development Agency v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Erie County Industrial Development Agency v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Exley v. Village of EndicottNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Armco Drainage & Metal Products, Inc. v. MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Schultz Construction, Inc. v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Naftilos Painting & Sandblasting, Inc. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Vulcan Affordable Housing Corp. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Cattaraugus Community Action, Inc. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- North Country Installers v. Commissioner of LaborAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987