Legal Opinion
Exley v. Village of Endicott
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 1980PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Wachtler, J.
The central issue on these cross appeals is whether a municipality violated a competitive bidding statute (General Municipal Law, § 103), when it did not offer competí-• tors of the New York Telephone Company the opportunity to bid for the right to provide the municipality with certain telephone terminal systems. The petitioners, Gary Exley and 753 Harry L. Drive Corp., argue that the modern tariff system under which the equipment was to be provided rendered the transaction the functional equivalent of a sale, and brought it within the strictures of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Signacon Controls, Inc. v. MulroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Albion Industrial Center v. Town of AlbionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
3Cited by18 opinions
- DiCintio v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Fischbach & Moore, Inc. v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Diamond Asphalt Corp. v. SanderNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Citiwide News, Inc. v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Progressive Dietary Consultants of New York, Inc. v. Wyoming CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.