Legal Opinion

Bartsch v. Irvine Company

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1967No. 11252PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE JAMES T. HARRISON

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal by defendant from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff.

The plaintiff-respondent is Ronald D. Bartsch, administrator of the estate of Deanna L. Bartsch, deceased, and will be referred to as plaintiff or by name. The defendant-appellant is Heckman & Shell, a co-partnership, and will be referred to as defendant.

The facts of this case are these: On October 5,' 1965, Mr. Bartsch was returning to his home in Bozeman, Montana, from a business trip to Whitehall, Montana. Mr. Bartsch’s wife Deanna and his two…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Herrin v. SiebenMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Beinhorn v. GriswoldMontana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Smith v. WilliamsMontana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Thompson v. MattuschekMontana Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Montgomery v. GehringMontana Supreme Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ambrogini v. ToddMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Sanders v. Mount Haggin Livestock CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Larson-Murphy v. SteinerMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Jenkins v. Valley Garden Ranch, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State Ex Rel. Martin v. FinleyMontana Supreme Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API