Legal Opinion
Hazen v. Mullen
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 1, 1929No. 4724PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a judgment in the Supreme Court of the District in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $15,000 in an action against tjie defendant and another for malpractice in administering X-ray treatments.
The declaration is in two counts, in the first of which it is alleged that the defendants “negligently and without reasonable skill or care, too frequently applied and used the said X-ray apparatus upon the plaintiff, and excessively exposed the plaintiff to X-ray treatments and to the influence and effect of the said X-ray.” In the second count it is alleged that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. PoppletonMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon · 1869
- Cayton v. EnglishCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
- MacKenzie v. CarmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Gramaldi v. ZeglioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
3Cited by15 opinions
- Morrison v. MacNamaraDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Meek v. ShepardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- District of Columbia v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- Washington Hospital Center v. ButlerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Talley v. VarmaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.