Murray Co. v. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Grady County'; Will Linn, Judge. ■ " , Action by the Murray Company against the Chickasha Cotton Oil Company ¡and others to foreclose a chattel mortgagb. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
PRYOR, C.
On tbe 6tb day of June, 1913, H. W. Branum gave a real estate mortgage to the Chickasha Cotton Oil Company on certain property upon which was located, a cotton gin, to secure the payment of two promissory notes. The Ohick-asba Cotton Oil Company brought an action to foreclose the mortgage.
■Subsequent to the execution of said real estate mortgage, on about the 20th day of August, 1913, tbe said Branum purchased from tbe Murray Company certain ginning machinery and placed 'the same on the premises in the ginhouse covered by. the real estate mortgage. Branum gave his notes in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. New Orleans RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Binkley v. ForknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Lawton Pressed Brick & Tile Co. v. Ross-Kellar Triple Pressure Brick MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Anderson v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1902
- Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. BushSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Continental Gin Co. v. SimsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Scrivner v. PopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- T. J. Stewart Lbr. Co. v. Cloud Chief GinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- John E. Mitchell Co. v. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935