Legal Opinion

Howard v. Bouwman

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 8, 2002No. Docket 226850, 228067PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In these consolidated appeals, plaintiffs appeal by delayed leave granted in Docket No. 226850 the trial court’s order dismissing their complaint for failing to comply with MCR 2.223(B)(2), the rule that requires plaintiffs to pay the costs and expenses for a change of venue. In Docket No. 228067, plaintiffs appeal by right the trial court’s order granting defendant Allegan County Clerk summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(I)(2) and denying plaintiffs’ summary disposition motion. We reverse the trial court’s order granting defendant clerk’s summary disposition motion and denying…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Lapeer County Clerk v. Lapeer Circuit JudgesMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Sovereign v. SovereignMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Saint George Greek Orthodox Church v. Laupmanis Associates, P.C.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Smith v. Henry Ford HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Liggett Restaurant Group, Inc. v. City of PontiacMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. In Re Credit Acceptance Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Tice Estate v. TiceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Grabow v. MacOmb TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Department of Health and Human Services v. Annette BirminghamMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API