Legal Opinion

United States v. Claycraft Company

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 26, 1972No. Civ. A. 6308PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

KINNEARY, Chief Judge.

This action was instituted by the United States to recover allegedly erroneous refunds of taxes plus interest from the Claycraft Company. The total amount of the refunds is $50,003.14 for the fiscal year ending November 30, 1956 [1956]. Included in this total is the sum of $7,994.05, which constituted a net operating loss carryback from the fiscal year ending November 30, 1959 [1959]. The jurisdiction of the Court arises under Title 28, United States Code, §§ 1340 and 1345, and Title 26, United States Code, § 7405(b), and is not contested.

On February 28,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bolen Webb and Cornelia Webb v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Angelus Milling Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Tina Deal v. The Cincinnati Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  4. United States v. Cannelton Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. PattersonDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. AugspurgerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1978
  2. United States v. MacPhailDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API