United States v. Augspurger
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
ELFVIN, District Judge.
The United States of America (“the Government”) instituted this suit pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7405 to collect an erroneous refund of federal taxes. 1 Jurisdiction exists under 26 U.S.C. § 7402 and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1340 and 1345. There are several motions before me for decision: plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against defendant Augspurger; plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on its “counterclaim in reply” against defendant Loeb, Rhoades & Co. (“Loeb”); defendant Augspurger’s motions for partial dismissal and for partial summary judgment;…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Annette Heyman v. Commerce and Industry Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Markham v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Gouveia v. Internal Revenue Service of the United States (In Re Quality Health Care)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
- Rochester Radiology Associates, P.C. v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1985
- Dampskibsselskabet AF 1912 Aktieselskab v. Black & Geddes, Inc. (In Re Black & Geddes, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Sharon Steel Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- United Jersey Bank/Central, N.A. v. Collated Products Corp. (In Re Collated Products Corp.)District Court, D. Delaware · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.