Mayfield v. Giblin
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROOKSHIRE, Justice.
Petition for writs of mandamus and prohibition.
The trial court acted entirely correctly in the exercise of its broad and, indeed, decisive discretion which by law places in trial judges the power to accept or to reject such proffered plea bargains as in this case. Hence, the trial judge’s rejection or disapproval of the said proposed plea bargain was entirely lawful. Since, in our view, the district judge acted and proceeded well within his authority and discretion, our Court would be in error if we granted the Relator’s petition for writs of prohibition or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Curry v. GrayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Homan v. HughesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- State Ex Rel. Wade v. MaysCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Bryan v. McDonaldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Papillion v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1995
- Ortiz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
- Wright v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2005
- Allen v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.