Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Am. Nat'l Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 2016No. 15-689PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIETZ, Judge.

This case presents an issue of first impression involving N.C. Gen. Stat. § 45-36.6(b), a statute that permits rescission of a notice of satisfaction for a security instrument if that instrument was "erroneously satisfied."

The parties have two competing interpretations of the phrase "erroneously satisfied." Wells Fargo argues that "erroneously" means precisely what it says-any error or mistake of any kind. American National argues that the statute applies only if the error was believing that the underlying secured obligation had been paid off when in fact it had not.

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Childers v. Parker's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Lunsford v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
  3. Morris Communications Corp. v. City of Bessemer City Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2011

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re: I.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. C Invs. 2Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  3. C Invs. 2Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
  4. Coastal Conservation Ass'n v. State of N.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  5. Coastal Conservation Ass'n v. State of N.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API