Legal Opinion

In re: I.B.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 2018No. COA18-608PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIETZ, Judge.

*403 Respondent appeals the trial court's order terminating her parental rights. Her court-appointed counsel filed a "no-merit" brief indicating that there are no non-frivolous issues on appeal. We have conducted an independent review of the record and agree that any arguments Respondent might advance on appeal are frivolous. We therefore affirm the trial court's order.

We could end our analysis here. But because this Court has found itself so divided over whether we must conduct an independent review in these cases, we take the time to provide a thorough legal analysis.

As explained…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Polk County v. DodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Dogwood Development & Management Co. LLC v. White Oak Transport Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re L.E.M.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
  2. In re M.R.C-M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  3. In re S.S.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  4. In re T.M.L.E.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API