Legal Opinion

McDuffie v. Perkerson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 14, 1933No. 9780PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQtlpijrt, J.

On May 17, 1903, the plaintiff a¡3 a citizep and *231taxpayer applied to the superior court for leave to file an information in the nature of quo warranto. Because of disqualification, the judge of that court to whom the application was tendered designated the judge of the Griffin Circuit to preside, who refused to sanction the application and denied leave to file the information. The bill of exceptions contains two assignments of error. The first complains that on a hearing, in response to an order requiring the petitioner “to show cause why he should be permitted to file said application and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Ex Parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. State Ex Rel. Barney v. HawkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Turpen v. BoothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Wiley v. City of SpartaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Botts v. Southeastern Pipe-Line Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Sheffield v. State School Bldg. AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  3. Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
  4. Morris v. PetersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  5. Sowers v. WellsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API