Lampfield v. Keene Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
The evidence in this case against several manufacturers of asbestos products was that Stanley Lampfield suffered from emphysema, probably caused by smoking, and from pleural thickening and plaques, probably caused by exposure to asbes tos. 1 The evidence was in disagreement as to whether the pleural thickening was asymptomatic. Defense evidence was that it was asymptomatic and that any shortness of breath had been caused by the emphysema. The claimant’s evidence was that the pleural thickening was responsible for the “changes in volume and the loss in diffusing capacity” made…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CabezaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Blackwell v. Com. State Ethics Com'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Ottavio v. Fibreboard Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Altiere v. Fibreboard Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Murray v. Philadelphia Asbestos Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Schultz v. DeVauxSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Murray v. Philadelphia Asbestos Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994