Legal Opinion
Murray v. Philadelphia Asbestos Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 11, 1994No. 02859-02864Published
1Opinion of the Court
433 Pa. Superior Ct. 206 (1994)
640 A.2d 446
Theodore and Mary MURRAY, H/W
v.
PHILADELPHIA ASBESTOS CORPORATION, GAF Corporation, Raymark Corporation, Southern Textile Company, Garlock Inc., Fibreboard Corporation, Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., Keene Corporation, Celotex Corporation, J.P. Stevens and Company, Inc., and Owens-Illinois, Inc.
Appeal of FIBREBOARD CORPORATION.
Theodore MURRAY and Mary K. Murray, H/W
v.
PACOR, INC., Eagle Picher Industries, Keene Corporation, Southern Textile Company, J.P. Stevens Company, Celotex, Inc., Owens-Illinois Glass Company, Fibreboard Corporation, GAF…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. CabezaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Maritime Electric Company, Inc., a New York Corporation v. United Jersey Bank, a New Jersey Banking Corporation Michael Gill and Maritime Electric Company, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation. Michael Gill, Third-Party v. Maritime Electric Company, Inc., a New York Corporation Thomas Gill, Individually and in His Capacity as President of Maritime Electric Company, Inc., (n.y.), Third-Party Maritime Electric Co., Inc., (Plaintiff and Third-Party Defendant) and Thomas Gill (Third-Party Defendant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.